In “The Mirror for Magistrates and the Politics of
Readership”, Paul Budra discusses the different editors of The Mirror for
Magistrates. His argument is that the
most recent editor, Richard Niccols, essentially ruined The Mirror for
Magistrates. He argues that Niccols’
intent for his edition of the work is what led to its decline.
Budra begins by
discussing the first few editors, what they included in The Mirror for
Magistrates, and how it impacted society and how well the collection sold. The first editor, William Baldwin, included
works through the War of the Roses. The
second editor, John Higgins, “filled in the period from Brut until Ceasar”. The
third editor, Thomas Blennerhasset, included material from the Roman Conquest
to William the Conqueror. The fourth and
last editor, Richard Niccols, included more works from that time.
Budra discusses
the essential differences and importances of the works included by each of the
editors. The first three editors mainly
included material that was old enough to not really cause any turmoil in
society. The material they included was
mostly historically based. It was far
enough in the past to not cause unrest in their present day society. While there were lessons meant to be seen in
the works, the works were not about things recent enough to cause issues.
While the previous
editors all made changes that were gradually causing a decline in the Mirror,
the final editor, Richard Niccols, was really the one who caused the greatest
decline, by including propaganda. His
edition was meant for the “urban reader” rather than the original audience of
political authorities, but as Budra says, ultimately “was bound to alienate the
citizenry”. Budra discusses how Niccols
ultimately missed the mark with his edition.
Ultimately it did not sell, even being released on 3 separate
occasions.
Ultimately,
Budra’s argument is that The Mirror for Magistrates was ultimately ruined by
Niccols. What was originally a
collection meant for political authorities to read and learn history from was
eventually turned into a piece of political propaganda. Niccols took The Mirror and changed who the
intended audience was, but the intended audience did not appreciate what he did
with the collection. This audience then
did not purchase the collection, and led to it dying out. As Budra said, “Niccols finally broke the
Mirror”.
No comments:
Post a Comment